Steve Rubel writes in his post “Jack Trout Fishes for a Hook” that Jack Trout is incorrectly hammering word-of-mouth marketing in Forbes. I have to agree with Steve’s words:

“File this under man bites dog. Marcom guru Jack Trout is throwing a big dark cloud over word-of-mouth marketing (including blogging) because there’s no way to control it. What’s worse, he’s urging folks to just advertise instead.”

I mean, c’mon. WOM is for real and it can be stimulated.

Here is a tiny bit from Jack’s article.

“Now for the really bad news. There’s no way to control that word-of-mouth. Do I want to give up control and let consumers take over my campaign?”

Oh Jack, where have you been for the past five years? We all lost control a while back. We can no longer simply count on the old black magic of :30 TV commercials. Where has Jack been? Want the bad news… Jack is paid by major advertisers like AT&T, P&G and IBM to assist them with their brand strategies.

I’ll let Steve’s words do more of the talking about Jack. But, this Troutism reminds me of his ex partner Al Reis’s book “The Fall of Advertising and the Rise of PR.” Al gets it wrong too. He hammers advertising and praises PR. He sites Starbucks as a brand that grew without any advertising and just great PR. Well, if I had 6,216 street corner locations I wouldn’t need advertising either. And, by the way, who ever said that we can control what a writer ever writes?

The bottom line you ask? In today’s marketing world it takes a holistic approach. Do the ads, do the PR and do the WOM. Whatever it takes. It isn’t either or.